wall

It’s been exciting to witness the impact that the Internet has had on media as well as consumer journeys. A large part of my time at work goes into defining the ultimate mix of activities/investments behind own, bought and earned media (from a digital perspective). From a search perspective, own/bought/earned media can be defined as SEM (paid/performance media), SEO (own media optimization) and SMO (earned/social media optimization). All of these activities, in my opinion, are working media. Recent studies have shown that 80% of internet sessions start with a search of some kind. Searching as such has undergone a huge transformation, evolving from the “linear” search engine search triggered by a particular need, to “real time web” searches/feeds, which instantaneously tap into your own social networks and contact base. Depending on the industry (physical goods), percentages of consumers referring to online sources at some stage of their purchase decision, can be as high as 91%. If nearly 80% of these internet sessions start with a search of some kind, capitalizing “on the search window” becomes immensely important. However, albeit being interesting and extremely relevant within digital environments, it got me and some colleagues thinking further about the whole relevance that ties everything back to the “real world”.

My point being: SEM, SEO and to some degree even SMO are practices that emerge from the world of the PC based Internet. PC’s don’t know exactly where you are, who you are and what friends are around you. From a business perspective, you’re trying to capitalize on overall traffic interested in your brand based on keywords, but you can’t filter it down to a time/context specific grid. It’s challenging to sell a product online that a consumer needs at 8:45 Pm in West Helsinki. (Finnish stores stop selling beer after 9pm) Mobile devices allow you to do this. This brings along an entirely different type of ecosystem for brands to optimize against. A consumer searching for Adidas sneakers in downtown Manhattan, becomes a “golden lead” for any retailer that happens to operate a shoe business within that proximity area. Your virtual experience leads to a physical experience, which we all know is much more personal, intimate and (yes), social. Brands start seeing direct correlations between digital media and its attribution to physical sales. A topic argued over in several instances and forums.

While efficient SEM/SEO/SMO allows you to grasp the global internet population around the topic, you can’t tie it to an instant need that is time/context sensitive. Mobile devices will bring along an entirely new kind of media practice, which one could label as social location optimization, or as SLO just to add another abbreviation :)

They say that good listeners make friends, have solid marriages and even succeed as salespeople. The art of listening is a virtue that brands often miss when thinking about their social media presence.

A colleague of mine made a comment on why are most sales and marketing terms somehow war related? We map out our “target” audience, we “execute” our media plan that aims at “converting” leads into sales. Our “guerilla” tactics involve “commados”. It’s like orchestrating a full scale battle in which an “enemy” = “competitor” is defeated and the consumer is “conquered” through “blasting” the brand message out there.

When thinking about social media, many brands spend most of their time identifying opportunities to shout their own messages to consumers. This goes against what we want as human beings. We want to be heard, we want someone to listen and value our input. However, as bad listeners, bad brands don’t really seek for opportunities to listen, instead, they look for a chance to speak their own message as soon as they have a chance. Brands & people that are bad listeners, don’t really listen. They hear what people are saying, but subconsciously they are just waiting for an opportunity to shout out their own opinion on the matter and seeking for points in the conversation that would make their own case more successful.

man_vs_machine

Brands underestimate the underlying importance of listening. When looking at most monitoring tools, a great emphasis is placed on the “robotic”, math driven monitoring tools that measure the conversions and click throughs that are anchored in the traditional, linear funnel thinking. Machines can gather and interpret linear, yes/no data, but they don’t have emotions and creativity.

 The modern monitoring layer is much more of driven by a “cyborg”, data smart, yet creative monitoring layer. Today’s purchase funnels are not linear. Consumers cross reference data on the web, read reviews, consult their peers and search for additional promo codes that might work in online stores. This new funnel creates the demand for a completely different kind of sales and marketing organization. We need less media planners, less marketing strategists, less traditional marketing managers to play smart when evaluating print ads that the creative agency produced.

Today’s age calls for listeners. Listeners are great community managers, webmasters, customer care reps, social media optimizers. Their job is to listen to what is happening and react, connect, help, participate. This type of media is not expensive, but it’s not free either. It simply means that modern working media is about time. Listening takes time, but it converts much better than shouting.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.